world war ii

All posts tagged world war ii

History of History: World War II Simulation: Hit & Miss Franchises

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 08/07/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

wwiisimhit

Here we are — the final part of the History of History: World War II feature! This has been a long and fun ride and I hope everyone has found some games they enjoy. This last feature will talk about all the little guys of the World War II simulation genre. Notice that this is a very niche market. Even the most popular franchises get less than 50,000 sales, if they even hit that mark they are considered run away successes.

196568_41669_thumbAir Warrior II

Release Date: 2/28/1997

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 73%

Sales: <10,000

Air Warrior was one of the first WWII flight simulators out of the gate. It had a lot of feedback and some complex gameplay, but was knocked for the chunky graphics and so-so network play (it was modem to modem back them). Still, man air simulation nuts loved it until the next great game came out.

bar

196569_41670_thumbAir Warrior III

Release Date: 11/30/1997

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 75%

Sales: <10,000

And not less than 6 months later the sequel is pretty much just an online game. After hearing about the problems with the second one, Kesmai went ahead and made it actually online and not LAN. The graphics were enhanced thanks to DirectX graphics to the chunky planes issue was gone. The gameplay itself didn’t change much from the last game, and it did have some pretty lame explosions.

bar

71566_16815_thumbWWII Fighters

Release Date: 1/1/1998

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 78%

Sales: <10,000

At the time, Jane’s flight series were top of the line. WWII Fighters pushed PCs to their limits (you needed at least a Pentium 233…GASP!) and had a bunch of cool extras like interviews and full specs on all the planes. The gameplay was tight, the graphics were awesome, and the online play was great. There wasn’t too much to complain about here, WWII simulation aficionados had something to brag about.

bar

 

 

199253_43257_thumbWarBirds

Release Date: 6/30/1998

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 76%

Sales: <10,000

Online games have come a long way. No longer do you need to host conventions or LAN parties just to play with someone. No longer do you need special paid server fees to go online. WarBirds was one of those, as many as 200 people could dogfight online, and a special convention was held in Texas every year just to play this game. Playing these flight sim combat games was all about the online play. It will take you tens of hours just to learn the characteristic of one plane — then you have 49 more to learn…you do the math.

bar

56582_41429_thumbMicrosoft Combat Flight Simulator: WWII Europe Series

Release Date: 9/30/1998

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 72%

Sales: <10,000

Microsoft Flight was popular because the community could create stuff to expand the game. This series and Quake were the two biggest and most modded games back in the late 90’s (and a year later Unreal Tournament was added to that list). This expansion added WWII planes and a campaign, but with the communities help it made the expansion that much better.

bar

198052_42561_thumbNations: WWII Fighter Command

Release Date: 10/31/1999

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 53%

Sales: <10,000

This game had an identity crisis. It was both action arcade and simulation that didn’t work well. Up to this point, the mid-late 90’s were the best ear from flight simulation games. Nations was a disaster, the online component was completely action oriented with simple controls. Many gamers took the game back due to “false advertising” on the box. This was not a fun time for Psygnosis.

bar

378402_19862_thumbB-17 Flying Fortress: The Mighty 8th

Release Date: 12/13/2000

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 75%

Sales: <10,000

B-17 was a very ambitious and highly anticipated flight-sim at the time. You played as an entire crew in a warplane. The issues were the lack of no online component, the game had horrible frame rate, and there were many bugs to be had. That said, fans still liked it and it had a not-so-great sequel.

bar

436470_43878_thumbIron Aces

Release Date: 2/6/2001

Systems: DC

GameRankings: 69%

Sales: <10,000

A flight sim on DreamCast?! No way! Yes way, but it wasn’t all that great. It tried to please the impatient arcade console players while trying to lure PC sim players to consoles. This led to a boring experience and couldn’t get it right on either side. The DreamCast had this issue with many PC games that went to consoles, it might have helped its quick demise.

bar

479386_44300_thumbB-17 Gunner: Air War Over Germany

Release Date: 5/20/2001

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 51%

Sales: <10,000

While not exactly a simulator, it spawned from the B-17 simulation series. The entire game suffered from unplayable framerate that crippled the entire game. Despite this it was only fun for 20 minutes at a time, probably something that would have been better on the PS2 at the time. Still worth a look if you like the series.

bar

530939_50987_thumbWarBirds III

Release Date: 3/19/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 80%

Sales: <10,000

WarBirds was one of the kings of online flight sims at the time. It’s biggest issue was the poor implementation of ground vehicles, something that Air Warrior II made a staple in the series. Why drive a vehicle to a base when you can fly there in a fraction of the time? It didn’t make any sense. Jumping into an AA gun was great from some instant action, yet despite these flaws it was a rockin’ online game.

bar

914640_51836_thumbSecret Weapons Over Normandy

Release Date: 11/18/2003

Systems: PS2, Xbox, PC

GameRankings:

PS2 — 79%

Xbox — 75%

PC — 73%

Sales: 

PS2 — 480,000

Xbox — 250,000

PC — <10,000

Wow, finally a slight sim on consoles! Not really. It has a hint of simulation to it, a first person cockpit, and that’s about it. The PS2 version looks the worst, but the graphics are very bland. It plays the best on PC, yet all the flight sim players turned their nose up at it. They “let those console players have it” while they continued to fight it out in WarBirds and IL-2 Sturmovik.

bar

919041_51577_thumbThe History Channel: Battle of Britain: World War II 1940

Release Date: 10/16/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 69%

Sales: <10,000

This game is pretty much a flight sim for casual players. There are a lot of auto options, easy difficulty, low system requirements, and various other things to bring in new comers without making them pay hundreds of dollars for weird controllers and a fancy computer. The game plays surprisingly well, but it’s still a flight simulator. A lot of hardcore fans scoffed at it, but it is still a good entry for new comers today.

bar

915132_55484_thumbFirePower for Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator 3

Release Date: 6/11/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 89%

Sales: <10,000

This expansion added over 50 planes and a new campaign to the WWII lovers out there. One notable feature was being able to stick your head out the cockpit while taxing — something that every WWII sim couldn’t really do. While IL-2 was dominating the online flight sim pack — FirePower added more thrills to one of the most modded game series of all time.

bar

920852_57871_thumbWings of Power: WWII Heavy Bombers and Jets

Release Date: 9/13/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 87%

Sales: <10,000

Wings of Power was praised for the immaculate detail to the texture work and sound of the planes, the only downside was no combat. This is because the Flight Simulator 2004 engine was used and that engine doesn’t have combat built into it. If you just love flying planes this is your game, if you want some action, look elsewhere.

bar

920156_59266_thumbPacific Fighters

Release Date: 10/26/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 78%

Sales: <10,000

Pacific Fighters was probably a bit too real. It takes several minutes to prep yourself to make contact with the enemy and this is boring. The campaign was plagued with this, and no manner of great graphics will remedy it. You have to either make the scenarios yourself or download community made ones. This one is for the very patient only.

bar

920405_54095_thumbHeroes of the Pacific

Release Date: 10/25/2005

Systems: PC, PS2, Xbox

GameRankings:

Xbox — 77%

PS2 — 76%

PC — 75%

Sales:

PS2 — 290,000

Xbox — 130,000

PC — 10,000 

Yet another flight game that tried to appeal to both sides. It had solid gameplay, but was just repetitive and got boring after a while. The consoles means dumbed down arcade-y gameplay that flight sim fans hated. It was a decent rental back in the day, but PC flight sim players stayed far away from it.

bar

926936_63606_thumbBlazing Angels: Squadrons of WWII

Release Date: 3/23/2006

Systems: PC, Xbox, PS2, X360, PS3, Wii

GameRankings:

Xbox — 72%

X360, PS3 — 66%

PC — 63%

Wii — 57%

Sales: 

Wii — 810,000

PS3 — 630,000

X360 — 390,000

Xbox — 80,000

PC — <10,000

So it begins. Now that the consoles are powerful enough to have flight sims on them, they instead turn into mediocre arcade shooters. Blazing Angels was looked down upon with PC flight sim fanatics, and the console gamers ate it up. Surprisingly, the worst version, the Wii version, sold the most. It had dull mission objectives, bad voice acting, and just very middle of the road.

bar

932863_77657_thumbWings of Power II: WWII Fighters

Release Date: 7/11/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 92%

Sales: <10,000

One of the few WWII flight sims that didn’t focus on combat. This game was all about the approach, it had fantastic graphics (for its time) and was well liked by fans. This game didn’t get much attention, even with hardcore sim fans which is sad.

bar

935941_112337_thumbCombat Wings: Battle of Britain

Release Date: 12/30/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 80%

Sales: <10,000

Combat Wings was kind of so-so. It was all about the combat, forget everything else. Hardcore sim fans gave it a wide berth while casual players could enjoy it. The voices were in German only (while authentic it was distracting to read the subtitles) and the graphics were nice but cartoonish.

bar

937790_83720_thumbB-17: Fortress in the Sky

Release Date: 7/19/2007

Systems: DS

GameRankings: 34%

Sales: 20,000

One of the only WWII games on DS and the only WWII flight sim game. Taking a PC game and smushing it on the DS is a bad idea. The graphics were just awful and made everything an unrecognizable blur. The missions were all the same, and you just gunned down the same planes over and over again. Just stay away from this.

bar

937958_84132_thumbBlazing Angels 2: Secret Missions of WWII

Release Date: 11/6/2007

Systems: PC, PS3, X360

GameRankings:

X360 — 72%

PS3 — 70%

PC — 69%

Sales:

X360 — 120,000

PS3 — 110,000

PC — <10,000

Blazing Angels 2 was pretty enjoyable in a sense that there was a lot to do. Tons of upgrades, a lot of planes, but no one was playing online and that’s what dogfighting is all about. Hardcore PC fans turned this down (as you can see by the sales). Consoles were taking over the flight sim market and turning into a bunch of arcade shooters. However, this niche market was dwindling fast and is the result of hardly any new flight sim games on PC.

bar

944542_98950_thumbWWII Aces

Release Date: 3/21/2008

Systems: Wii

GameRankings: 37%

Sales: 210,000

Another crappy flight game on Wii. Everything that could go wrong went wrong here. Awful motion controls, dated graphics, bland and boring missions, overly difficult. I actually saw this sitting in a bargain bin last month for $5. It’s sad that this is where the flight sim genre has wound up.

bar

944094_97930_thumbWWII Battle Tanks: T-34 vs Tiger

Release Date: 10/17/2008

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 66%

Sales: <10,000

This game is a decent simulator (for how rare tank simulators are). It had horrible graphics and bad controls, but also featured a super short campaign. It was well liked by sim fans, but quickly got overrun by World of Tanks.

bar

984928_153944_thumbWings of Prey

Release Date: 12/25/2009

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 79%

Sales: <10,000

With so few flight sim games these days Wings of Prey was well received. While it was lacking in a few departments, it had plenty of planes to fly and some of the best flight sim graphics ever seen. If you want to play something more modern this is a good start.

bar

651837_239184_thumbDamage Inc.: Pacific Squadron WWII

Release Date: 8/28/2012

Systems: PC, PS3, X360

GameRankings:

X360 — 49%

PS3 — 44%

PC — 40%

Sales: 

X360 — 30,000

PS3, PC — <10,000

It’s sad the great flight sim genre has to go out like this. Like being put down like a sick dog, Damage Inc ruined the whole genre. Being packaged with a cheap flight stick, consoles gamers will never know the glory of a true sim. The game was ugly, had horrible controls, was unresponsive, and had dull missions.

History of History: World War II Simulation: Silent Hunter

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 07/14/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , . Leave a comment

wwiish

There really aren’t that many submarine simulators, Silent Hunter being among the best (and only of the few that exist). The series wowed the patient wargame and simulation gamers with its excellent graphics and long-winded fights. The series had ups and downs, like any series, but will always be among one of the best simulation games series of all time.

198642_42897_thumbSilent Hunter

Release Date: 2/29/1996

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 81%

Sales: <10,000

At the time, Silent Hunter was one of the most realistic simulators ever made. The sound and graphics were “near perfection” and there was just so much put into here for the niche submarine lovers out there. It was just knocked a lot for having to be extremely patient to play. There isn’t much action here at all, Call of Duty fans won’t be playing Silent Hunter any time soon.

bar

517863_44386_thumbSilent Hunter II

Release Date: 11/5/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 69%

Sales: <10,000

Silent Hunter II was probably the best naval combat sim at the time, but it was in development for so long that the developers forgot the long term goal. The graphics were seriously out dated, the campaign was lackluster at best, and there were sever oversights in the realism department. The game was plenty playable, but the hardcore fans (the few out there) nitpicked this one to death.

bar

919601_61180_thumbSilent Hunter III

Release Date: 3/15/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 89%

Sales: 40,000

Silent Hunter III is considered the best game in the series. Three long years after SH2, SH3 was a highly polished machine, probably the single best naval combat simulator ever made. They stepped up the graphics department a lot. This was one of the most realistic looking games on PC at the time and required new graphics card to run it. There were only minor issues with the save system, it didn’t support very high resolutions, and that’s about it. If you want a naval combat simulator (or to just check one out) this is it.

bar

926972_63642_thumbSilent Hunter: Wolves of the Pacific

Release Date: 3/20/2007

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 80%

Sales: 30,000

After the excitement of SH3 players had to wait 2 long years for another game. This game was also highly praised, but was just more of the same. It had some nasty bugs and the AI took a dive this time around. Still a great game if you enjoyed SH3.

bar

943866_97437_thumbSilent Hunter: Wolves of the Pacific — U-Boat Missions

Release Date: 3/24/2008

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 73%

Sales: <10,000

This expansion for Wolves of the Pacific was just fine, it was just light on content. Only 2 boats and one small German campaign, that’s it. It was only $10 at the time so it was kind of like DLC instead of an expansion. Still worth a look if you love the series.

bar

971406_137968_thumbSilent Hunter 5: Battle of the Atlantic

Release Date: 3/2/2010

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 61%

Sales: 210,000

Not only is this the best selling SH game, but also the worst. I think the developers just didn’t care anymore. The game had so many bugs and glitches it was nearly unplayable, the new captain UI was hideous, and it just hogged the resources dry of even the beefiest system back in the day. The tutorials were useless and so was the manual. What happened!? This goes to show that even the best in a series can go down hill. This would be the last game in the series for the PC before jumping to iPhone.

bar

992898_163136_thumbSilent Hunter Mobile

Release Date: 4/5/2010

Systems: iPhone

GameRankings: 50%

Going from PC to mobile is really weird. The game looked good for the time, but was plagued with extreme difficulty — extreme as in extremely easy. You can beat the whole game and can’t even die if you tried to get killed. It literally ruined the game, and it had a very slow and sluggish pace. This would be the last game in the series, who knows if Ubisoft will bring it back from the dead.

History of History: World War II Simulation: IL-2 Sturmovik

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 07/05/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , . Leave a comment

il2

354449_43572_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik

Release Date: 9/18/2001

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 91%

Sales: 10,000

IL-2 Sturmovik was not only a legendary war plane of World War II, but also a legendary flight sim for PC gamers. It has fantastic graphics (at the time) and was one of the most realistic sims of all time. The multiplayer was well talked about, but the canned campaign missions really brought the game down a bit. Thankfully, the IL2Gen utility allowed you to re-create randomly generated missions to help fix this issue. The missions were also short on objective hints and didn’t really tell you what to do. Most people didn’t even finish the campaign because of this.

bar

561444_51309_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Forgotten Battles

Release Date: 3/2/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 87%

Sales: 10,000

Forgotten Battles was the long-awaited expansion for the first game. It was a stand-alone game, but didn’t quite have all the content people wanted. The campaign was still disappointing, but the improved graphics and audio experience helped quite a bit. Sim fans continued to mod the game and it looked like the IL-2 series made itself king of the flight sim family.

bar

915372_50808_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Operation Barbarossa

Release Date: 7/31/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 66%

Sales: <10,000

Honestly, I can’t find much on this expansion. From what I can gather, fans were tired of the crappy campaigns and Barbarossa didn’t offer much that was new for the series. That 66% may be inaccurate because it’s based on just one review. It seems the series may have taken a nose dive at this point, but most of us will never know.

bar

919047_52131_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Forgotten Battles – Ace

Release Date: 3/2/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 82%

Sales: <10,000

This is where things picked up. Ace is the official expansion to the Forgotten Battles expansion. Ace was riddled with minor issues like there was no campaign for American fighters. The cockpits were fully rendered but nonfunctional, and various other technical problems with the planes during flight. Nothing that a few patches couldn’t fix, but fans ate it up and it helped continue the long running successful series.

bar

932855_75323_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Pe-2

Release Date: 4/28/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 85%

Sales: <10,000

Pe-2 has as little info as Barbarossa does. However, Pe-2 was a Europe only release but the single reviewer seemed to have liked it. I can’t find much info on the series for how good it is, but from what I can gather it added many new great planes to fly and continued to slowly build the series into more excellence.

bar

937033_84511_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: 1946

Release Date: 3/13/2007

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 85%

Sales: 30,000

1946 helped propel the series into a new generation and was the most successful so far. It accumulated all the previous games and made them playable on newer OS as well as adding a few tweaks, while also including all patches. This was a great package for new comers and it seemed to have worked. If you want to start the IL-2 series this is the one to start with.

bar

946815_114732_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

Release Date: 9/8/2009

Systems: PS3, X360, PSP, DS

GameRankings:

X360 — 80%

PS3 — 79%

PSP — 60%

DS — 42%

Sales: 

PS3 — 640,000

X360 — 470,000

PSP — 170,000

DS — 60,000

Oh boy, this is something you don’t do, abandon your main fan base. For years IL-2 was PC gamers pride and joy and Ubisoft turns around and makes the latest version a console exclusive. It didn’t help that the game was terrible. The console versions were just okay, they had great graphics but that’s about it. They were more arcade like and it was ruined by the fact that no one was playing online. The portable versions were terrible with the DS version being the worst, the game was literally unplayable and broken. The PSP version had slightly better controls, but was really ugly.

bar

619316_195584_thumbIL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

Release Date: 4/16/2011

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 51%

Sales: 30,000

Ubisoft learned their lesson and brought the sequel (and so far final) game in the series back to PC. It was finally updated with top-notch visuals, but was nearly unplayable thanks to the insurmountable amount of bugs and glitches. It shows that most series start out great and revolutionize something and then just fall apart in the end. The IL-2 series ran for 10 years with some ups and downs, but there are still many community fan sites that keep the series running.

History of History: World War II Strategy: Hit & Miss Franchises

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 06/27/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , . Leave a comment

wwiihitmiss

The wrap-up of the strategy section of History of History: World War II deals with hits and misses over the past decade and a half. There were many strategy games that just flooded the PC market, and PC gamers had to sift through them to find the gems. Not all were bad, but some here just one hit wonders never to see the light of day again.

431783_43872_thumbCombat Command 2: Danger Forward!

Release Date: 12/17/2000

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 65%

 

Here’s an interesting game. It was by order mail only through the website, and came shrink wrapped in a paper sleeve with the game manual. It was also play-by-e-mail as well so just imagine. The game is very simplistic, but fans of this genre know that doesn’t matter. The problem that held this game back so much was the terrible AI, and this was a problem with all war games back in the day until real-time strategy took off. It’s worth a look for the hardcore at least.

bar

198842_43020_thumbSudden Strike

Release Date: 1/23/2001

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 76%

Sales: <10,000

Sudden Strike was a very simple WWII strategy game, it wasn’t serious at all. It had a toy soldier type look to it, but didn’t sit well with hardcore strategy fans. Once you beat the campaign there was no reason to really go back.

bar

518912_44397_thumbCombat Command 2: Desert Rats

Release Date: 7/29/2001

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 71%

 

Not much changed from Danger Forward, but it was considered a bit better. It still had an overly simplistic design and look. It just pretty much got the job done, but wasn’t really worth it unless you were a hardcore strategy gamer. Most people preferred the table top games, but good luck finding a copy.

bar

561264_45001_thumbAirborne Assault: Red Devils Over Arnhem

Release Date: 7/7/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 77%

Sales: <10,000

Ever wonder how a game can be good with just one map? Call of Duty can’t. Airborne Assault could do it because it gave you full control. It came with a huge manual that detailed various tactical elements on the map, background on how the strategy works, tips, and various other things. They don’t make strategy games like they used to. This was back when you kicked your shoes off Friday night and sat down on your computer for 2 days doing nothing but figuring out the game. Your second weekend was dedicated to playing, and the third was conquering.

bar

561957_51391_thumbStrategic Command: European Theater

Release Date: 7/16/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 67%

Strategic Command was well known for the “what if” scenarios you could play out rather than what happened hour by hour. It was still a simple borderline table-top looking game, but it all came down to the core strategy. It was mainly plagued with terrible AI, and wasn’t much different from other WWII strategy games at the time. Good luck finding someone today who will play these.

bar

466248_44103_thumbG.I. Combat

Release Date: 11/4/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 44%

 

While most games thus far have been pretty decent, G.I. Combat is a real dud. This was back when strategy games started transitioning to 3D and weren’t doing a good job of it. The game had jerky animations, terrible graphics (even for back then), and downright awful AI. It also didn’t give you full control of your units.

bar

534049_44568_thumbWorld War II: Panzer Claws

Release Date: 11/14/2002

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 63%

Sales: <10,000

The end of 2002 was a time where strategy games for more casual players was coming out with more action like Command & Conquer and Warcraft. (Yes, it was an RTS before it was an MMO for all you kiddies out there) Panzer Claws had dated visuals that actually interrupted gameplay, as well as having that bad AI. This was a rough time for RTS.

bar

543009_51071_thumbWorld War II: Frontline Command

Release Date: 6/22/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 72%

 

Frontline Command was a bit better, it had better graphics, but was still poorly paced, and had a bad interface. One mission would be fast paced and fun, and the next three would be stealthy and bring everything to a crawl. It’s still worth looking into if you’re a hardcore RTS or WWII fan.

bar

589701_47274_thumbSquad Assault: West Front

Release Date: 11/2/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 67%

Sales: <10,000

At this point in time the Close Combat creators were pumping out games that kept resembling the groundbreaking strategy series. The graphics were still really dated, and it seemed the WWII strategy scene just couldn’t straighten itself out. While West Front wasn’t bad, it was just something we’ve played again many times before.

bar

914556_51806_thumbAirborne Assault: Highway to the Reich

Release Date: 12/10/2003

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 78%

Sales: <10,000

Wargaming is a really niche market, so niche that only 1 in maybe 100,000 people are into it. Airborne Assault finally got it right and pushed the genre a bit further. It was really fun and very accessible where many games in the past weren’t. If you love wargaming, or want to get into it, this may be a good start.

bar

914817_47558_thumbWar Times

Release Date: 4/1/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 55%

 

War Times was riddled with many issues and lazy design. A lot of the maps were symmetrical so the AI could overwhelm you with better units quicker than you can build them, there were path finding issues, and many other problems that put this game at the bottom of the WWII RTS pile.

bar

915040_56271_thumbSoldiers: Heroes of World War II

Release Date: 6/30/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 78%

 

Soldiers was an “almost but not quite” RTS game. It had a solid campaign and multiplayer, but had issues with bad controls, difficulty, and various other small issues like bugs. I actually got this game free back when Direct2Drive was still around. I never got around to playing much, but the first two maps I played were fun, the game was accessible, and it had some entertaining presentation.

bar

562461_59210_thumbCodename: Panzers, Phase One

Release Date: 9/30/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 81%

Sales: <10,000

The Codename: Panzers series seemed to hit the sweet spot for WWII RTS gamers back in the day. It had excellent presentation, well built maps, and a lengthy and challenging campaign. It was highly anticipated back in the day and was what Company of Heroes is now, same kind of exposure. If you are itching for a good WWII RTS game I would start with this.

bar

919801_25512_thumbD-Day

Release Date: 12/7/2004

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 59%

Sales: <10,000

D-Day was just another WWII strategy game that was uninspired. The game had the usual problems, boring missions, bad pathfinding, dumb AI, and was just really generic. It did have some good interviews with war vets, but that’s about it.

bar

919852_60001_thumbGary Grigsby’s World at War

Release Date: 3/25/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 74%

 

Gary Gribsby’s was probably one of the best WWII wargame games to come out in years. It had clean visuals, and addictive strategic gameplay that went beyond the usual Allies and Axis stuff. It just had some bad animations, a fixed resolution, and the menu was really cluttered.

bar

925552_61324_thumbCodename: Panzers, Phase Two

Release Date: 7/25/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 80%

Sales: 10,000

Codename: Panzers continued to be a solid RTS franchise. The second game had more great missions, solid multiplayer, and one of the best things was that there were multiple solutions to most battles, that wasn’t like most RTS games. It did have dated graphics, and a few others minor issues, but it was still solid.

bar

927683_66631_thumbLock ‘n Load: Band of Heroes

Release Date: 8/26/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: N/A

 

Honestly, this is one of the most low profile WWII strategy games you can find. There are no reviews for it online, it was that small of a game. I doubt this thing sold 1,000 copies. It was the video game version of the tabletop hex game. It was actually released during a game convention it was that low budget. I honestly can’t tell you how good the game is, but wargame fans should track it down.

bar

927121_65796_thumbSquad Assault: Second Wave

Release Date: 8/31/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 60%

Sales: <10,000

Squad Assault fell into the mediocre range again bringing recycled content from past games. It was really just the first game but just all mixed up. It had dated graphics, and was extremely difficult. Still worth a look for people who liked the first.

bar

919240_54365_thumbBlitzkrieg 2

Release Date: 10/2/2005

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 76%

 

Blitzkrieg 2 was popular because it was just fun and solid. It was fast paced, had destructible environments, and looked clean. While it was technically dated (as most RTS games were back then) it was also very easy.

bar

Strategic Command 2: Blitzkrieg

Release Date: 4/28/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 62%

Strategic Command 2 was very average. It had terrible visuals, even by wargame standards, but had many scenarios and units, but the end battle outcomes were a bit confusing. This is probably only worth a look for hardcore wargame fans. Everyone else will fall asleep.

bar

928230_71690_thumbRush for Berlin

Release Date: 6/12/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 76%

Sales: <10,000

Rush for Berlin was a bit of a blessing for WWII RTS fans. It had great graphics, good AI, and amazing sound effects. It also had a great campaign and was very interesting to play. Anyone looking for an RTS game should check this out.

bar

932544_74672_thumb

Moscow to Berlin: Red Siege

Release Date: 6/14/2006
Systems: PC

GameRankings: 57%

 

Red Siege was another flash in the pan WWII RTS game. By now the WWII craze had died down, and many gamers were tired of it. The game looked 4 years old, and it bland and uninspired and just plain boring.

bar

928184_71000_thumbFaces of War

9/12/2006

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 66%

Sales: <10,000

Yet another WWII RTS that just looked good and forgot the rest. There were many AI problems, boring linear missions, and it just wasn’t interesting. As it is, this is just another forgotten WWII RTS game to throw into the pile.

bar

562047_59006_thumbBattlestations: Midway

Release Date: 1/30/2007

Systems: PC, X360

GameRankings:

PC — 77%

X360 — 73%

Sales:

X360 — 230,000

PC — 10,000

Battlestations was one of the last into the foray of WWII RTS games. It was highly anticipated because of the mix of strategy and action. You could control planes and subs, and it looked good. The only issue was that the game was too short, and had control issues on the Xbox 360. This is also one of the few WWII RTS games on consoles.

bar

935064_83749_thumbBlitzkrieg II: Fall of the Reich

Release Date: 2/22/2007

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 58%

Sales: <10,000

Blitzkrieg was a great underdog WWII RTS series, but the expansions totally blew it. They were insanely difficult, had control problems, and the missions were boring and derivative.

bar

942710_94772_thumbBlitzkrieg 2: Liberation

Release Date: 10/12/2007

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 58%

Sales: <10,000

Less than 6 months and another expansion is released. More unforgiving difficulty, recycled content, and the same bad controls and missions design. Thankfully, Blitzkrieg hasn’t seen the light of day since.

bar

939558_87831_thumbStrategic Command 2: Weapons and Warfare

Release Date: 10/25/2007

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 85%

 

That 85% is misleading because it’s only one review. I can’t find much on this game, because the series pretty much died off and was already forgotten. This middling RTS series like Strategic Command and Blitzkrieg held on for dear life, but couldn’t make it due to the advance of PCs, the new generation of gamers, and the death of the WWII genre.

bar

932721_75123_thumbPanzer Tactics DS

Release Date: 11/6/2007

Systems: DS

GameRankings: 69%

Sales: 60,000

Wow! A wargame on the DS?! Impossible! This is the only one that exists on the system and it’s surprisingly good for the hardware’s limitations. Despite having the tiny screen, you can get a lot out of the game. It thankfully implements a thorough tutorial for the target audience, but can be very dry and has monotonous music. If you own a DS and need a wargame fix, this is your only option.

bar

933168_101129_thumbTheatre of War

Release Date: 5/19/2008

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 78%

Sales: 10,000

Theatre of War was one of the last successful WWII RTS franchises. It was very realistic down to the bullets, and wargame fans clamored for it. It was slow to start, and did get boring in spots, so even casual RTS fans may balk at it. The game looked amazing (for the time it was a system hog) but the great AI and other features helped it along.

bar

943501_96583_thumbBattlestations: Pacific

Release Date: 5/12/2009

Systems: PC, X360

GameRankings:

PC — 77%

X360 — 76%

Sales:

X360 — 290,000

PC — 10,000

The short lived Battlestations series went out with a bang thanks to it’s explosive action of plane and sub battles as well as the great graphics. It was well balanced and fun, some missions were just too slow to move along and it had terrible voice acting.

bar

952158_110178_thumbTheatre of War 2: Africa 1943

Release Date: 11/19/2009

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 64%

 

Theatre of War went downhill fast. It had great graphics, but the highly accurate battles and mechanics on the game just didn’t work out well this time around. It also had many bugs and crashes and the game was very short. Still worth a look if you liked the first one.

bar

986267_215910_thumbTheatre of War 2: Kursk 1943

Release Date: 3/9/2010

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 66%

The Theatre of War franchise dropped like a rock due to the lack of polish and the WWII genre was now a niche market. No longer were games selling in the millions, people weren’t playing them online, only the die hard were left. I can’t find much on Kursk, due to the poor reception of Africa this one didn’t sell too well and not much was changed from the previous game.

bar

988396_157831_thumbOrder of War: Challenge

Release Date: 3/11/2010

Systems: PC

GameRankings: 72%

Sales: <10,000

Challenge is a great multiplayer expansion to the original and was just solid fun. At this point in time the WWII genre had nearly completely faded from existence and only a few remaining games were left. Order of War is worth a look if you want a solid RTS game.

bar

684636_280889_thumbHistory: Legends of War: Patton

Release Date: 11/6/2012

Systems: PC, PS3, X360

GameRankings:

X360 — 61%

PS3 — 60%

PC — N/A

Probably the last WWII RTS game to come out shouldn’t be surprised that it’s a dud. There’s a lot of attention to historical detail, but that’s where it stops. It has bad AI, pathfinding problems, boring missions, and it just isn’t any fun to play. It is even worse to play on consoles. There was a version for Vita that was planned but it was cancelled after the unsurprising criticism.

As you can see the WWII RTS genre kept a steady run throughout the 12 years of it’s popularity. Around 2006 the genre started dying, but there was a peppering of hardcore tabeltop style wargames. A few franchises were flashes in the pan like Theatre of War, Codename: Panzers, Blitzkrieg, and Battlestations. None of these could stand up to the WWII RTS juggernauts.

History of History: World War II Strategy: Close Combat

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 06/01/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , . Leave a comment

close

Close Combat was another long running RTS series that didn’t get the spotlight. The first game was revolutionary because it was one of the first that had real-time combat and smart AI. It also had a slick interface. RTS fans were proud of this game, but the series eventually fell into mediocrity like nearly every game series does.

18717_41359_thumbClose Combat

Release Date: 6/30/1996 — PC

GameRankings: 91%

 

Close Combat was one of the first real-time strategy games and it had smart AI and a great interface to boot. This game won strategy gamers over, it also had an intuitive tutorial which were hard to come by back then. This game pretty pre-dated every other WWII strategy game and can be called one of the first. It’s funny to hear people freak out about giving orders as you go, but before this game CPUs weren’t powerful enough to handle everything in real-time, it was all turn based.

bar

43349_41397_thumbClose Combat II: A Bridge Too Far

Release Date: 9/30/1997 — PC

GameRankings: 89%

 

A Bridge Too Far is as perfect as the first game. The whole “real-time” thing was still buzzing everyone’s minds, so when another game came out that had it, it was highly praised. This just goes to show that Close Combat is one of the most highly polished RTS games EVER made, yes, even more polished than some from today. The graphics are crisp and sharp, and the map design is spot-on as well as the mission structure. Even if you hate WWII games, this is a must play for RTS fans.

bar

96044_50131_thumbClose Combat III: Russian Front

Release Date: 12/31/1998 — PC

GameRankings: 77%

 

Some say this is the best game in the series. It was just when the 3D transition was starting (people actually complained about that surprisingly) and was one of the last 2D games. It still had great graphics, and the gameplay was spot on. It added some touches here and there, but if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The missions structure and map design was superb as always. However, the opposite side was saying it’s too close to the last game and needs a serious reboot.

bar

196941_50223_thumbClose Combat IV: Battle of the Bulge

Release Date: 11/30/1999 — PC

GameRankings: 80%

 

The yearly releases of Close Combat was starting to take a toll on the series. The fourth game was a solid strategy game, but it didn’t have the revolutionary stuff like it did nearly four years ago. It was pretty much the same game in a different theatre of war, some fans were okay with that.

bar

375013_43769_thumbClose Combat V: Invasion: Normandy

Release Date: 10/10/2000 — PC

GameRankings: 76%

 

 

This is where Close Combat really took a nose dive. The developers didn’t want to advance the series in any way. The graphics were looking really dated and the same gameplay remained with just a new part of the war. The game still had solid AI and various other qualities from past games, but fans wanted more and they were seriously tired of marching to the same tune. The developers got the message because this was the last game in the series, and not a word was heard about it for nearly 6 years.

bar

936142_81099_thumbClose Combat: Cross of Iron

Release Date: 2/12/2007 — PC

GameRankings: 78%

 

Here’s how to not reboot a series, by making it the same from 10 years ago. The devs didn’t update the graphics, and didn’t learn from their mistake 7 years ago. Close Combat was once a revolutionary strategy game, but is now the old man in the back of the crowd that can’t be heard. This game was so unpopular that it’s hard to dig up info on it, and it’s sequel. The few people who did talk about it say that it’s still the same solid RTS game in another part of the war. Long time fans may not care, but it’s a good game to jump into for new comers.

bar

6728196356-utClose Combat: Panthers in the Fog

Release Date: 11/19/2012 — PC

GameRankings: 80%

 

15 years later and the same formula remains. The graphics just look really good but are still 2D, and a layer of gloss was just added to the whole series. Is this the devs opus? Probably not, but why make such a dated game so far long the timeline? Fans are honestly tired of this series and why these games kept getting released is beyond me. Cross of Iron sold very few copies so what was the incentive here? The devs may also be naive to the fact that the WWII genre was pretty much dead in 2012 and was long forgotten.

Close Combat is a perfect series that shows how it can be revolutionary from the start and if it doesn’t learn new tricks it will quickly be forgotten. It  was one of the first RTS games ever made, but seriously, why keep it so dated almost 15 years later? Close Combat is one of the most puzzling series as well in terms of design choices later on. It’s still one of the best RTS games that can grace you hard drive, so pick it up if you can.

History of History: World War II Strategy: Hearts of Iron

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 06/01/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , . Leave a comment

hearts

Hearts of Iron isn’t a very flashy RTS, but it’s very deep. The entire series was a bit bumpy, it had many flaws, but was loved by hardcore RTS fans. The game allowed you to get an inside look of how WWII strategy and tactics were done. Most important of all it was addictive as ever and had a lot of features and deep research trees.

560933_44927_thumbHearts of Iron

Release Date: 11/24/2002 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 75%

 

 

The first game in the series was generally enjoyable but had a lot of flaws. It looked very generic trying to copy Europa Univeralis’s style. The menus were cluttered, audio wasn’t qued right with actions, the AI was spotty, and it just wasn’t as polished as it could have been. It was a huge hit with strategy players and they regarded it as one of the best strategy games of the time, and the best WWII strategy game at the time. While Commandos was already long going, Hearts of Iron stole the deep tactical side of fans and the series was a hit with them.

bar

920609_61594_thumbHearts of Iron II

Release Date: 1/4/2005 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 83%

 

 

Over two years fans had waited for a sequel and they finally got it. HoI3 is considered the best game in the series because it pretty much fixed all issues from the first game. It allowed an incredible amount of depth and giving you control of all sides of WWII. Play as the Japanese in China, or help fight the Nazis in Russia. This is what the first game should have been, but it still had a couple major issues. It was really hard to get into and was confusing for the first few hours. Most strategy games like this have a steep learning curve and require patience. The presentation looked even more dated and was way behind in terms of graphics from other strategy games. This didn’t stop fans because the series continued on.

bar

930839_71713_thumbHearts of Iron II: Doomsday

Release Date: 4/7/2006 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 78%

 

 

With the success of the second game, Paradox release the expansion that included WWII and also part of the Cold War. It was basically Hearts of Iron II with nukes and make the game that much more intense. It still had the dated visuals and various other issues that Hearts of Iron II had, but was really solid and fun. The $20 price tag was a nice incentive, overall the game was just solid and fans who wanted more Iron II would love this.

bar

952508_111110_thumbHearts of Iron III

Release Date: 8/11/2009 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 77%

 

 

While the WWII genre was already dead, Hearts of Iron III marched on. It finally delivered a higher budget game with 3D graphics for once, it also addressed most of the issues from the last games. The game was pretty much redone to make you feel like a general instead of a drone by cutting back on micromanagement. The main issues were just lazy over sights like the typos in the game, translation issues, constant slow down from too many calculations in the background, and various other issues. While the old ones were fixed, new ones arose which really hurt this threequel in the end. It’s still a solid game, but fans of the series were getting bored at this point.

bar

994626_164867_thumbHearts of Iron III: Semper Fi

Release Date: 6/7/2010 — PC

GameRankings: PC:  65%

 

 

Hearts of Iron pretty much lost all the fans as they moved on to better games. 2010 is late in the game for WWII games and Semper Fi did little to change the underlying issues of the series. It added new features, but various bugs remained that fans of the third game were fed up with. The series at this point got very little attention and even big name game sites looked the other way. Paradox has always been known for making lesser known strategy titles for the truly hardcore fans. Semper Fi added a fun Japanese campaign, but other than that was disappointing.

bar

620592_197103_thumbHearts of Iron III: For the Motherland

Release Date: 6/28/2011 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 64%

 

 

Instead of concentrating on a fourth game Paradox continued with the tired, and now dead Hearts of Iron III. The game had been running for three years and there wasn’t much left to win fans over. Once again, the game fixed some previous issued but brought new ones, this time a lot of balancing issues. Many things like the US and UK have an unfair advantage because their economies are incorrectly setup and various issues like that. The game even had a scheduled third expansion that was later cancelled.

Hearts of Iron was a great table top style strategy game that in the end failed to keep fans interested because of the constant issues that plauged the series. Will we see another game? Maybe not because 2013 is a year where the last thing people want is another WWII strategy game. However, like Company of Heroes, if Hearts of Iron does something fantastic with the genre and series fans may come crawling back. We’re starting to see a real pattern here. Almost every WWII series has eventually driven itself into the ground. What can developers do to fix this? Not much. There’s only so much you can do with a historical event.

History of History: World War II Strategy: Commandos

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 05/23/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

commandos

Commandos was one of the best strategy games of all time, and one of the best WWII strategy games. Early on, Commandos was one of the few strategy games that pushed the genre forward. It was linear but allowed creativity and could be played cooperatively  The game was just so well designed. The missions were varied, the pacing was great, and it was addictive. The series held up throughout its short lived life, but strayed off to the FPS genre and didn’t do so well. What’s happening with Commandos now? No one knows. After the disastrous Strike Force in 2006 no one heard hide nor hair of the game. If you have an appetite for a great WWII strategy series, this is it.

63451_41452_thumbCommandos: Behind Enemy Lines

Release Date: 7/31/1998 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 80%

 

 

Behind Enemy Lines was praised for its tight gameplay, fun mission structure, and excellent map design. It had crisp sharp 2D graphics which was rare for strategy games back then. It was really overlooked and didn’t get a spotlight, but hardcore strategy fans ate it up like candy. The game was linear, but allowed room to let you do things your own way. The game was just well made and fast paced. It didn’t have the slog of some other strategy games like Civilization. A lot of fans say this was the best in the series, but later games were also solid.

bar

130794_41530_thumbCommandos: Beyond the Call of Duty

Release Date: 3/31/1999 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 79%

 

 

The expansion for the first game was alright, but added new things that kind of broke what didn’t need to be fixed. It was also more difficult and was just too much like the first game. This is usually okay, but don’t change core mechanics that don’t need to be changed. The game was just not balanced as well with too many troops to really handle or deal with, and just various other things that fans didn’t like. It wasn’t terrible, but could have used improvement.

bar

913803_18357_thumbCommandos 2: Men of Courage

Release Date: 9/20/2001 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 84%

 

 

Men of Courage is considered the best one in the series by everyone. It was just bigger and better. It was in 3D and allowed a 360 degree view of the battlefield which was high-tech back then. The only problems were that it was too difficult and had some pretty bad bugs. Men of Courage was probably the most popular in the series and even went on to have a console port which was rare for RTS games. It seems Pyro hit the sweet spot with fans, what more could they do?

bar

432034_27609_thumbCommandos 2: Men of Courage

Release Date: 8/28/2002 — PS2, Xbox

GameRankings: Xbox: 74%

PS2: 71%

Sales:

PS2: 180,000

Xbox: 70,000

Commandos 2 was so popular on PC that a console port was greenlit. The biggest challenge was translating the PC controls to a controller. It was a challenge, and as decent as the controls were, just didn’t translate well. This was the biggest issue with the console version, also the resolution was lowered so the small men on screen were hard to see. The game had major camera issues, but these were only apparent to players of the PC version. Console players who never played the PC version would be none the wiser. It was a solid strategy game on consoles and one of the few good ones on PS2 and Xbox.

bar

561644_45141_thumbCommandos 3: Destination Berlin

Release Date: 10/14/03 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 74%

 

 

Destination Berlin was the long awaited sequel to Commandos 2. With better graphics and more gameplay ideas fans were pumped. One underlying issue plagued Commandos 3 more than the other games, it was extremely difficult to the point that people gave up on it. It had excellent graphics, some of the best at the time, but more long running issues remained unchanged. There were some interface issues, bugs, and various AI problems. The game was fun online like before, but the game didn’t sell as well as Commandos 2 and no one heard of the series since and haven’t for 10 years. Strike Force came out three years later, but fans raged and refused to by the game leading to its ultimate demise.

Commandos is one of the best strategy games around and it seems Company of Heroes has picked up the torch. It offered excellent maps, missions, and extremely difficult challenges. The multiplayer was fun and the graphics and sound were good and it continued to please fans. The ultimate demise was due to poor sales in the end. It wasn’t profitable enough for Eidos and they eventually canned the series after the dreadful Strike Force FPS. If you really want an old school strategy game and some WWII mixed in this is the way to go.

History of History: World War II Strategy: Company of Heroes

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 05/17/2013
Posted in: Blogs, History of History: World War II. Tagged: , , , , , , , . Leave a comment

coh

There were dozens of WWII strategy games, almost more than shooters. Strategy allowed you to see the tactical side of the way and could play out real scenarios in a more realistic manner. Many of them were boring and bad, but the king of them all is Company of Heroes. It revolutionized the strategy genre and surprisingly pushed PCs to their limits with DirectX 10 graphics. Who would have thought a strategy game would do that? Company of Heroes had a great interface, tons of levels, addictive multiplayer, and great strategy elements. The only issue was that the game was as buggy as sin, but slowly got patched over time.

927618_66555_thumbCompany of Heroes

Release Date: 9/13/2006 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 93%

Sales: Unknown

 

Company of Heroes was a fantastic game and one of the best strategy games ever made. It was just one of the best WWII games period. It had great tactics, a wonderful interface  and really showed the gritty depressing tragedy of the war. You got down to the individual tactics that only a strategy game can do. It was praised by everyone for all the great features. It also used DirectX 10 graphics and really pushed PCs to their limits, it was  a benchmark game and a graphics card seller. It only received some nit-picking about long load times, a lot of bugs, and the small amount of factions you could choose. Every strategy gamer needs to play this.

bar

938946_86280_thumbCompany of Heroes: Opposing Fronts

Release Date: 9/24/2007 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 87%

Sales: Unknown

 

Opposing Fronts was the highly anticipated expansion and was received warmly. It added new factions that were really needed, and a whole new campaign that was a blast to play. The destructible environments really helped push the game’s surreal atmosphere, it honestly didn’t get better than this. Bugs still remained despite being a year old, yet fans at the game up like candy.

bar

953028_112119_thumbCompany of Heroes: Tales of Valor

Release Date: 4/7/2009 — PC

GameRankings: PC: 71%

Sales: Unknown

 

I can’t say it enough, even the best games can fall from grace. Two years was a long gap for an expansion to come out. By now people had moved on, why Relic released an expansion 18 months later is a head scratcher. You can really feel the lack of attention to the game because the new campaign could be finished in a couple of hours and was just lacking. It only added a few new maps and was just nothing compared to the previous games. THQ must have forced Relic to make this, it also looked really dated at this point in time. It goes to show that you can’t force and rush even the best of games. The series would take a long 4 year hiatus for the next sequel.

bar

669914_261808_thumbCompany of Heroes 2

Release Date: 6/25/2013

GameRankings: N/A

Sales: N/A

 

I know this game isn’t out yet, but the fact that a WWII game is coming out in 2013 is pretty weird and scary. Can it live up to the original game? Will it have ground breaking graphics again using DirectX 11? It focuses on the Russian front in 1941 which will be interesting. After all these mediocre WWII strategy games have come out what else can Company of Heroes offer? June 25 will tell all.

Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 05/12/2013
Posted in: Microsoft Consoles, PC Reviews, PlayStation 2, Sony Consoles, Xbox. Tagged: , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment
920237_62001_thumb

Publisher: Ubisoft

Developer: Gearbox Software

Release Date: 3/15/2005

Rating: Mature

MSRP: $39.99

Also Available On

ps2
xbox1
bar

World War II shooters were everywhere, but Ubisoft and Gearbox took a dangerous risk and released one so late in the game. 2005 was a year where WWII shooters were at their peak and when gamers hated them the most. Brothers in Arms proved to be a more authentic and smarter shooter and won fans of the genre over.

Gearbox painstakingly recreated Carentan and many parts of France where the 101st Airborne Division landed on D-Day. The game also uses squad tactics and realism unlike any other WWII shooter out there. You will notice when you play how well the guns feel when you shoot them, and how you can’t nail an enemy from 100 feet away with a Thompson. You have to flank the enemy or you die. It’s that simple and that difficult. Red circles will appear above enemy squads. You can issue commands to your squads to suppress them. Their circle will turn gray and then it is safe to move up and find cover around the area to flank them. It sounds simple, but it’s not. Your squadmates can die and so can you if you aren’t careful. You have to watch out for MG fire which will kill you in an instant, and sometimes even tanks.

gfs_54765_2_1

This realism and authenticity can’t be done without good AI and BiA delivers and is even impressive today. The only issue I had with AI was with tanks. Sometimes they wouldn’t go around each other or go the other way to follow a command. The game also requires a lot of patience. Sometimes even trial and error. You can’t just rush every enemy like in Call of Duty and save the day. You can order squads to rush and attack while your other squad suppresses, then you can charge in with them to kill them all. You can also order squads set positions that you want so you have total control. It feels good and is a key part of the game. Without mastering this you won’t get very far.

screenshot_pc_brothers_in_arms_road_to_hill_30009

You also can’t just use an M1 Garand and snipe an enemy’s head while he’s in cover. It just doesn’t work that way, you also can’t kill an MG unless you flank them. This isn’t Medal of Honor. This gave a great feeling of realism, but it was also very difficult. I died quite often because I chose a wrong tactic or I flanked the wrong way. Sometimes my impatience got in the way as well. I even found different weapons to help certain situations. When I finally got the Springfield sniper rifle it was a weapon from God. After all the inaccurate weapons that couldn’t hit crap, this thing made life easier, but only for a few levels at the end.

When it comes to looks, BiA looks great even to this day. The lighting looks real, the grass flows, the models and textures are pretty high-res (for back then) you will be impressed. The game holds up and is still better than a lot of shooters today. My main concern is that the game feels the same throughout. I just went around killing everything and maybe planted a few charges. I could mount an MG sometimes, ride the back of a tank, but overall there wasn’t much variety in the game which I find the biggest issue.

brothers-arms-road-hill-30_11_ss_l

What’s here is one of the most authentic shooters around and fans of the genre won’t be disappointed at all. The game looks great, has smart AI, and tells a sad story of Baker Company and the 101st Airborne.

Medal of Honor: Rising Sun

Posted by BinaryMessiah on 05/11/2013
Posted in: Gamecube, Microsoft Consoles, Nintendo Consoles, PlayStation 2, Sony Consoles, Xbox. Tagged: , , , , , , , , , . Leave a comment
589715_47277_thumb

Publisher: EA

Developer: EA LA

Release Date: 11/11/2003

Rating: Teen

MSRP: $49.99

Also Available On

xbox1
ngc
bar

Pearl Harbor was one of the worst terrorist attacks on the US and was what got us involved in World War II. EA decided to leave the frontlines of Europe and head to Hawaii at Pearl Harbor and into the Japanese and Philippine frontlines. It’s a nice change of scenery, especially back in the day when WWII shooters were coming out nearly every day. The problem is, Rising Sun is a reskin of Frontline with the lack of polish, detail, and just doesn’t feel complete. Rising Sun needed about 6 months more of development before being anything remotely decent. What we have here is a sluggish, boring, and mediocre shooter, probably one of the worst shooters of 2003.

The game actually starts out pretty nicely. The bombing of Pearl Harbor feels epic in this game, you are just a nobody sailor who gets woken up by the bombings. After you see the poorly pre-rendered cutscene you start controlling your guy and it feels very similar to Frontline, too similar. Right off the bat, you realize the control issues haven’t changed. The aiming is really sensitive and finicky, there are no iron sights aiming, and the controls just suck still. Once you run around the boat trying to escape your notice you can save at checkpoints. This is actually one of the only two major issues that were fixed from Frontline. The missions are very long and you no longer have to start at the beginning of every level when you die.

80508_full

Once you get out you notice the framerate is worse than Frontline. The FPS drops to single digits often and it actually affects gameplay. Trying to shoot someone when the game is chugging along at 5 frames a second is nearly impossible. It doesn’t help that the aiming is already wonky. The change of pace, in the beginning, using the turret on the boat and shooting down planes is fun, I also have to mention that the only great part of Rising Sun is the music. Medal of Honor has a fantastic score across all the WWII games, but Rising Sun needs more than that to save it.

Once you start the next level you realize the game is just so bad. The level design is abysmal with confusing mazes, it was cute for EA to try to make you feel like you have multiple paths but you really don’t. It just makes things more confusing. There are also secondary hidden objectives this time around but they are nearly impossible to figure out, hell even the regular objectives are hard to figure out. Items don’t flash so you can’t tell if it’s part of the scenery or something you need to interact with. Most of the time you just get lucky when a prompt comes up on the screen when you pass something.

moh-ea3

I like the new selection of weapons, the shotgun, Type 99, Sten MKII, and a few other Pacific Theatre weapons. That’s probably the only other great change from Frontline, but the guns control so horribly that you won’t care. The most annoying part of Rising Sun is the forced and failed implementation of stealth. During one of the last few levels, you get recruited into the OSS and have to infiltrate a Japanese summit at a hotel. The game gives you the Welrod which is a one-shot silenced pistol. Sure that’s fine, but Rising Sun wasn’t built for stealth. I shot the first few people silently then all of a sudden I was being attacked. I had to run around the whole level with just a pistol and the Welrod. Not very fun. The hints say to stick to the shadows and stay in the column areas. Yeah, sure what shadows? The stealth is just completely broken, but at least healing items give you more health so the game is a bit easier in that regard.

80503_full

Let’s finally talk about graphics, the game is butt ugly, even uglier than Frontline. During the jungle levels, the devs just put a flat texture of a forest on the walls. Yeah, good jobs you lazy jerks. The game is just ugly and is so unpolished. The events in the game are so unbelievable that it’s hard to think that these things actually happened. Did I mention there’s still no blood? The last thing to go is the terrible AI. The friendly AI just stands there while they’re being shot and completely ignore enemies, the multiplayer is also as boring as ever.

Rising Sun sold millions of copies, but couldn’t live up to the previous games quality. With ugly graphics, horrible framerate, terrible AI, bad level design and various other issues, Rising Sun stands as one of the worst games in the series.